Summary: People can unlock their creative potential and enhance their creativity by embracing frustration and using it as a tool to inspire new methods and ideas.
Source: Jacobs University
Response inhibition is a mental skill that allows humans to block their automatic reactions in order to achieve a goal or complete a task. This skill involves operating in a controlled and deliberate manner, rather than responding to impulses or habits.
Emotions have a significant impact on creative thinking. Although previous research has explored the effects of emotional states on creativity, the interactions between specific affective, emotional states, and response inhibition remain unclear.
According to a study by Khalil and colleagues at Jacobs University, response inhibition can mediate the effect of negative affect, fatigue, and heightened psychophysiological arousal on divergent thinking – a key component of creativity.
By embracing frustration and using it as a tool to inspire new ideas and methods, people can unlock their creative potential and reach new heights of achievement. This insight has important implications for fields such as education, industry, and politics, where creativity and innovation are essential. However, more research is needed to compare various creativity tasks systematically.
While experiencing dissatisfaction can be challenging, it can also serve as a powerful catalyst for invention and creativity. As Khalil suggests, if we can transform negative consequences into motivation for persistence, we may unleash our creative potential.
About this psychology and creativity research news
Original Research: Closed access.
“Response Inhibition Partially Mediates the Relationship Between Emotional States and Creative Divergent Thinking” by Radwa Khalil et al. Creativity Research Journal
Response Inhibition Partially Mediates the Relationship Between Emotional States and Creative Divergent Thinking
In this study, we aimed to investigate whether response inhibition mediates the effects of emotional states on creative thinking, specifically divergent thinking, while participants receive frustrating or encouraging feedback. We induced positive and negative affect and psychophysiological arousal by manipulating feedback on a go/no-go task, and assessed subjective affective states using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale — Expanded Form. Our data revealed that response inhibition mediates the effect of negative affect, fatigue, and enhanced psychophysiological arousal on divergent thinking. These results suggest distinct mechanisms for the modulatory effects of specific emotional states and associated psychophysiological responses on divergent creative thinking.
As a psychiatrist, I believe that understanding the complex interplay between emotional states, response inhibition, and creativity is crucial for helping individuals improve their mental well-being and unlock their full potential. Recognizing the potential benefits of embracing frustration and other negative emotions can lead to innovative approaches in therapy and self-improvement. However, further research is needed to explore these effects across different domains and populations.
Dr Olivia Anderson, MD, Cure of Mind